Lawyers for Divorce in Chennai – Get the Best Deals

Lawyers for DDA Matters in Chennai are experts in various areas of law. They are well trained and skilled in handling various cases like divorce, legal matters, property, criminal cases, contract disputes, personal injury, financial matters, and many more. So if you need a legal advisor in Chennai, then you should get a good lawyer.

Lawyers for DDA matters in Chennai are experts in different fields like bankruptcy, divorce, etc. The first step you need to take is to search for the best lawyer in Chennai. If you want to get a divorce, you can contact a Chennai Divorce attorney and discuss all your requirements. He will tell you what you can expect from the lawyer and what he can do for you.

In case of Chennai divorce, lawyers for divorce in Chennai can help you through every stage of your divorce proceedings. If you are interested in a divorce, then they can give you advice. These people can also assist you in getting a divorce. These experts are very much familiar with the Chennai Divorce laws and hence they will be able to guide you easily through the entire process.

If you want to get a property dispute resolved, these attorneys can help you in this area too. Most of the attorneys for DDA matters in Chennai are well versed in the field of property settlement. You should approach any of them so as to settle your case.

Lawyers for DDA matters in Chennai can also help you if you are looking for a better deal in the form of a mortgage loan. These people can provide you with a lot of information on the mortgage industry. They can also advise you on the best way to get out of this bad situation.

The above are some of the areas where these lawyers can provide you with the best advice in Chennai divorce. You should talk to any of the attorneys for a consultation and decide on how you want to proceed. Get a free consultation from the attorneys and decide which option is better for your case.

Lawyers for DDA matters in Chennai are well trained and skilled and therefore they are capable of assisting you with all your legal needs. They can help you file all the papers required for divorce and get a suitable settlement for the amount of money you will be paying.

Even if you have an existing financial problem that is keeping you from getting a divorce, you can still use these lawyers in Chennai. to get a suitable amount reduced.

A good divorce can save your reputation and ensure that you will not face any problems in future. as well as help you save some money as well. and still maintain a good relationship with your partner.

Delhi High Court Gives Centre 4 Weeks To File Affidavit On Bias Against Married Persons In JAG Dep

Questioning how marriage can have an adverse impact on a person’s ability to become an officer in the Judge Advocate General department of the Indian Army, the Delhi High Court on Friday asked the Centre to file a comprehensive affidavit in response to a petition alleging institutionalised discrimination against married women from entering JAG department.

The high court gave the Centre four weeks to file its affidavit.

The court is hearing a petition moved by Kush Kalra seeking to declare unconstitutional the eligibility conditions of the JAG department which prohibits entry of candidates on ground of gender or marital status in JAG.

While Kalra moved court against married women being discriminated against, the Army had, in an affidavit filed before the high court, said not only married females, but even married males are now prohibited from entry into its Judge Advocate General (JAG) department and all entries across the board while justifying its recently-introduced restriction on married males on the ground of changed socio-economic setup of Indian society compared to the 60/70s vintage when most men in 20-25 years age group were married.

Kalra also sought direction to the Army to consider candidates aged 21 to 27 for recruitment irrespective of their marital status in JAG department.

It is to be noted that initially, the Army had prohibited entry of married females in the JAG department.

However, during the pendency of Kalra’s petition, the Centre issued a corrigendum dated August 14, 2017 which extends prohibition on married females to married males for various entry schemes, including JAG.

The Army cited its vintage instructions to justify why married males were allowed entry into Army but not married females before the 2017 corrigendum placed prohibition on both married females and males.

“At the time when these Army instructions were formulated, the socio-economic realities of the country were such wherein at the age group of 20-25 years, a large number of males were married. Under such circumstances, not permitting married males would have reduced the eligible candidates to less than half. However, the induction of women was started in 1992. By then the socio-economic realities of the country had changed a lot and both male and female choose to opt for career as their first option before settling down for marriage,” it had said.

Kalra also challenged the corrigendum saying it should be quashed/stayed for curtailing the civilians’ rights to marry after attaining the legal age.

He said the Army could not change the conditions during the pendency of the petition.

https://familylawyerschennai.wordpress.com

Source : Live Law

Issues regarding Dowry prohibition Laws in India

Paying of dowry at the time of marriage and afterward is an age-old practice which is still being followed by the people in Indian society. Dowry in simple terminology is regarded as all the material assets given by the bride’s family to the groom and his family. The term dowry is derived from a Latin word ‘dotare’ meaning ‘to endow or to portion out’.It is very unfortunate that the concept of dowry is exploited to an extent whereby brides are priced according to the dowry that they can afford to pay.

Earlier the payment of dowry was voluntary and used to be given as a symbol of love but soon this practice turned into a social evil leaving the family of the young girls helpless. Today dowry is regarded to be one of the biggest social evil prevalent in the Indian society. The problem had aggravated to an extent where a bride would be burnt to death in every 12 hours for the demand of dowry.

It is highly unfortunate that the evil of dowry is prevalent in all sects of the society irrespective of religious background. Various laws have been enacted for the protection of women.

To begin with, the very first law enacted to deal with the menace of dowry was made in the year 1961. The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 was the first legislation to discuss the problem of dowry and provided for punishment for giving and taking of dowry. The Act prohibited the giving and taking of dowry by any of the parties to the marriage. It made a mandatory provision for giving back all the dowry to the bride if any was exchanged during the time of marriage.

The Act provided a punishment for giving and taking of dowry as an imprisonment up to 6 months, fine extending up to Rs. 15000 or the amount of dowry whichever will be higher or an imprisonment up to 5 years along with the persons who help in giving and taking of dowry or publishes advertises for marriage in response to dowry or who does not hand over dowry to the bride within the specified time.

However, the Act was not strict and stringent. It defined dowry as a gift demanded or given as a precondition for a marriage and left gifts given without a prior condition out of the ambit of the definition of dowry and gave it a legal status. To make the Act stricter to curb the social evil of dowry amendments were made in the Act. One of such amendments was to make a list of the gifts given and received.

The various provisions of the Dowry Prohibition Act after various amendments are as follows;

1. Definition;

The Act defines in clear terms what dowry is and all the things that amount to dowry the amendment of 1986 have defined the term in a more stricter way. As any valuable property or a security is given or which is agreed to be given either directly or indirectly by one party to the other party to the marriage at or before any time after marriage in connection with the marriage and the Act excludes dower (Mahr) in the parties to the marriage follow Muslim Personal Law. Thus, not leaving any corner for making dowry by any means legal.

2. Punishment;

The Act provides that id any person takes or in any way abets the giving or taking of dowry shall be punishable with an imprisonment for a term not less than 5 years and fine which is not less than 15000 or the amount/ value of the dowry whichever is more. The Act, however, makes provisions whereby a Court may for punish for a term less than 5 years.

The Act provides that the presents which are given at the time of marriage to the bride or the bridegroom without any demand having been made are not to fall within the ambit of dowry provided that such presents are entered in a list maintained in accordance with the rules of the Act. Also, the Act requires that when such presents are made by or on behalf of the bride or any person related to the bride are of a customary nature and the value is not excessive having regards to the financial status of the person

The Act also makes the demand of dowry punishable and states that if any person demands whether directly or indirectly dowry in any form shall be punishable with an imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than 6 months and may even extend to 2 years with a fine extending to 10000Rs/- the court is vested with the discretion to impose a punishment for a lesser time span after recording the reason for the same.

The Act also provides that if any person by any means advertises, publishes or prints any share of his property money or both as consideration for marriage of his son or daughter or any other relative shall be punishable with an imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than 6 months and can extend to 5 years or with fine extending to 15000 Rs/- the court can, however, record the reasons and sentence imprisonment for less than 6 months.

3. Agreement:

The Act makes an agreement made/executed for giving and taking of dowry void.

4. Transfer of Dowry:

The Act not only prohibits and punishes the practice of giving and taking of dowry but also ensures that if any dowry is exchanged before or after the marriage the same is to be given to the bride. Where a dowry is received before the marriage then the same is to be returned to the bride within 3 months of the marriage.

When the dowry is received after the marriage then the same is to be returned within 3 months of the date of receiving the dowry. If the dowry is received when the bride was a minor the same is to be returned to her when she attains majority and the same is to be held in trust till she attains majority.

The Act provides that if a person fails to transfer the same within the time prescribed then the same shall be punished with an imprisonment of not less than 6 months which may extend to 2 years or with a fine.

Moreover, provisions relating to dowry are also available under:

1. Indian Penal Code:
2. Section 304B (Dowry death):

Under this section provides that were dying of a woman is caused by bodily injury or otherwise than in normal circumstances within 7 years of her marriage and it is shown that soon before her death she was subjected to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any relative of her husband for or in connection with any dowry demand then such a death is called dowry death and such husband or relatives are presumed to have caused the death.

The section also provides that whoever caused dowry death shall be punished with an imprisonment for a term which is not less than 7 years and may extend to an imprisonment for life

1.Section 498 A:

Under this section whoever be it husband or relatives of the husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty shall be punishable with an imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.

2. Indian Evidence Act, 1872

3. Section 113 B (presumption as to dowry death):

Under this section, a presumption of dowry death is created when it is shown that soon before the death of the woman she was subjected to cruelty or harassment for or in connection with any demand for dowry then the court presumes that the person who subjected her to cruelty or harassment has caused the dowry death.

Case Laws:

1. Arjun Dhondiba Kamble Vs State of Maharashtra (1995 AIR HC 273):

In this case, the Hon’ble Court held that dowry as contemplated by the Dowry Prohibition Act is a demand of value property or security having nexus with the marriage. But when the demand for property or valuable security has no connection with the consideration for the marriage then it not considered amounting to a demand for dowry.

2. Rajeev Vs Ram Kishan Jaiswal {1994 Cri LJ NOC 255 (All)}

The Court, in this case, did not differentiate on the basis of the intention as it held that any property given by parents of the bride need not be in consideration of marriage. It can even be in connection with the marriage and would still constitute dowry.

3. Pandurang Shivram Kawathkar Vs State of Maharashtra {2001 Cr LJ 2792 (SC)}

The Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that mere demand for dowry before marriage is also an offense

Having observed the laws available for the protection of a woman against the demand of dowry it is important to understand that these laws will only bear the fruit when people realize and understand that this practice is a social evil devaluing a girl over boy and would in no way help in upliftment and development of the nation as nowadays girls and boys stand at an equal footing.

 

Concepts of joint family property explained.

Concepts of joint family property explained.

_*⭐SC: Concepts of joint family property explained.*_

_Joint Hindi family is there from ancient time perhaps, as a social necessity. A Hindu joint family consists of male members descended lineally from a common male ancestor, together with their mothers, wives or widows and unmarried daughters. They are bound together by the fundamental principle of sapindaship or family relationship which is the essential features of the institution. The cord that knits the members of the family is not Property but the relationship of one another._

_Case:_

_*Sunil Kumar Vs. Ram Parkash.*_

_Citation:_

_*(1988) 2 SCC 77: AIR 1988 SC 576: (1988) 1 HLR 573.*_

_Bench Strength *-2*_

_Coram: *Dr M.K Sharma and Anil R. Dave, JJ.*_

*********************

Maintenance – Object of – Duty of husband towards wife

_*⭐SC: S. 125 – Maintenance – Object of – Duty of husband towards wife to provide proper maintenance, and said duty continues until when – Maintenance of wife for her sustenance – “Sustenance” does not mean animal existence but signifies leading life in similar manner as she would have lived in house of her husband – Husband has bounden duty to enable wife to live life with dignity according to their social status and strata -*_

_Regard being had to solemn pledge at the time of marriage and also in consonance with statutory law that governs the field, it is the obligation of husband to see that wife does not become a destitute, a beggar – A situation is not to be maladroitly created whereunder she is compelled to resign to her fate and think of life “dust unto dust” – It is totally impermissible – In fact, it is sacrosanct duty to render financial support even if husband is required to earn money with physical labour, if he is able-bodied – There is no escape route unless there is an order from court that wife is not entitled to get maintenance from husband on any legally permissible grounds – Constitution of India, Art. 21 – Words and Phrases – “Sustenance”._

_Case:_

_*Bhuwan Mohan Singh Vs. Meena.*_

_Citation:_

_*AIR 2014 SC 2875 : (2015) 6 SCC 353.*_

_Bench Strength *2*_

_Coram: *Dipak Misra and V. Gopala Gowda, JJ.*_

**********************

Family court legal advice

10 advice from a judge who handled family dispute courts.

1.Don’t encourage your son and his wife to stay under same roof with you. Best to suggest them to move out, even to the extent of renting a house. It’s their problem to find a separate home.

More the distance between you and your children’s families, the better is the relationship with your in laws

2.Treat your son’s wife as his wife, not as your own daughter, maybe just treat her as a friend. Your son would always be your Junior but, if you think that his wife is of the same rank and if you ever scolded her, she would remember it for life.

In real life, only her own mother and not u will b viewed as a person qualified to scold or correct her.

3.Whatever habits or characters your son’s wife has is not your problem at all, it is your son’s problem. It isn’t your problem as he is an adult already

4.Even when living together, make each others businesses clear, don’t do their laundry, don’t cook for them and don’t baby sit their children. Unless, of course, there is a special request by your son’s wife and you feel that you’re capable and don’t expect anything in return.

Most importantly, you shouldn’t worry about your son’s family problems. Let them settle themselves

5.Pretend to b blind and deaf when your son and his wife are quarrelling. It’s normal that the young couple do not like their parents to b involved in the dispute between husband and wife.

6.Your grandchildren totally belong to your son and his wife. However they want to raise their children, it is up to them. The credit or blame would be on them.

7.Your son’s wife need not necessarily respect and serve you. It is the son’s duty. You should have taught your son to be a better person so that you and your son’s wife relationship could be better.

8.Do more planning for your own retirement, don’t rely on your children to take care of your retirement. You had already walked through most of your journey in life, there are still a lot of new things to learn through out the journey

It is your own interest that you enjoy your retirement years. Better if you could utilise & enjoy everything that you had saved before you die. Don’t let your wealth become worthless to you.

9.Grandchildren don’t belong to your family, they’re their parents precious gift

The above message is not only for you, please share it with your friends, parents, in-law, uncles, auntie, husband or wife to find peace & progress in life.

*Property Inherited By Female Hindu From Her Parents Shall Devolve Upon Heirs Of Her Father, Not Husband If She Dies Childless

Quashing an order passed by a joint civil judge junior division, Pune, the Bombay High Court has held that under Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, any property inherited by a female Hindu from her father or mother, will devolve upon the heirs of her father/mother, if she dies without any children of her own, and not upon her husband.

Justice Shalini Phansalkar Joshi was hearing a writ petition filed by relatives of one Sundarabai, who died issueless more than 45 years ago on June 18, 1962.

Case Background

The petitioners challenged an order of the joint civil judge junior division, Pune, dated November 28, 2016, wherein a suit filed by the deceased’s husband was declared maintainable. The petitioners are original defendants in this suit.

The suit was filed for declaration, partition and injunction in respect of suit properties belonging to the deceased.

It was argued by the defendants before the trial court that the plaintiff husband and his children do not have claim over Sundarabai’s property because the children who are named as plaintiffs in the said suit are actually Sundarabai’s step-children born from her husband’s second wife.

The trial court accepted the argument that Sundarabai’s step-children had no right on the said property but partly allowed the application by Sundarabai’s husband and noted that his claim needs to be adjudicated.

The petitioners sought a review of the said order but that was also rejected.

Submissions and Judgment

Chaitanya Nikate appeared for the petitioners in the matter. He submitted that once it is held that plaintiff Nos. 2 to 5 are not the children of deceased Sundarabai, then it follows that respondent also cannot have any share in the suit property in view of provisions of section 15(2) (a) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The court examined Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act and said:

Thus, as per sub section (2) of section 15, notwithstanding anything contained in sub section (1), any property inherited by a female Hindu from her father or mother, shall devolve, in the absence of any son or daughter of the deceased not upon the legal heirs referred in sub section (1) in the order specified therein, but upon the heirs of the father. This provision, thus, clearly excludes the husband from inheriting the property received by a female Hindu from her parents if she was not having any children or has died issueless.

http://www.lawyerchennai.com

Battered Woman Syndrome

”The enemy doesn’t stand a chance when the victim decides to survive”.

One of the emerging and accepted concepts over the last decade which has gained legitimacy in legal and psychological spheres in countries like Australia, New Zealand, United States, United Kingdom is the doctrine of Battered Woman Syndrome. The doctrine is applied to defend those woman survivors of domestic violence who are guilty of killing their oppressors under the law. Over the years there have been several legal reforms which have been directed to assist the survivors. ‘The Protection Of Woman Against Domestic Violence’ enacted in 2005 which provides civil remedies to the survivors besides criminalising domestic violence is one such law. The Battered Woman Syndrome doctrine has not been thoroughly applied by the courts of India as yet however, recently the Delhi High Court in its landmark verdict applied the said doctrine and held a male accused guilty of abetting suicide of his wife. The verdict indicates the first step of acceptance, recognition and applicability of this doctrine in the Indian context.

Name(required)

Email(required)

Phone(required)

Comment(required)

Submit

Δ

Battered Woman Syndrome is a mental disorder that develops in victims of domestic violence as a result of serious and long term abuse.

It has been identified as a subcategory of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Although not all battered woman meets all the criteria of PTSD, a sufficient number do. It is understood that domestic violence is a part of gender violence and that many more women than men are the victims of physical, psychological and sexual abuse. Even when women strike back its usually the woman who hurt themselves physically and emotionally. In fact, until battered woman takes back some control of their lives, they may not truly be considered survivors.

Battered Woman Syndrome begins as an abusive cycle of 3 stages.

The first being where the abuser engages in behaviours that create relationship tension. In the second stage, the tension explodes and the abuser commits some form of abuse; physical, emotional, sexual, psychological or otherwise.In the third, the abuser tries to fix his wrongdoing and apologises. The third stage is often termed as the ‘honeymoon stage’ as the abuser makes amends for his wrongdoings whereby he is forgiven and the cycle starts all over again. Gradually as the cycle continues the victim starts to believe that its her own fault. When the victim takes responsibility of her abuse it is termed as ‘learned helplessness’. The victim hereby is convinced of her own helplessness and that the abuse cannot be escaped. Thus, Battered Woman Syndrome develops.

Characteristics which battered Woman exhibit are the follows:

• They fear for their safety
• They irrationally believe that the abuser is powerul and will hurt her grievously if she contacts authority
• They take full responsibility of the abuse
• Suffer from depression 5) seek addiction of drugs and alcohol.

A woman who has been continuously abused over a prolonged period may suffer from a psychological condition which is more severe than usual depression or post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Instead of looking for more options to escape she is lured into staying in such violent and abusive relationship. At the face of such violence the woman is eventually compelled to eliminate such an abuser in order to protect herself or her children when such an abuser is vulnerable and is in no position to fight back when attacked. The action taken by such a woman is not out of a sudden, grave or an immediate provocation.

DOCTRINE AS A LEGAL DEFENSE

The courts in  Australia, New Zealand, United States and United Kingdom have accepted the growing body of research  showing that battered partners can use force to defend themselves and sometimes kill their abusers because of the abusive and life threatening situations in which they find themselves acting in a firm belief that there is no other way of self- preservation. It was introduced in law to explain the reasonableness of a woman actions in self defense against her abuser. The critiques of this doctrine argued that the use of such a defense in the court would strengthen the stereotype that woman are irrational and emotional . Also ‘ learned helplessness’ suggested that woman who survived horrendous abuse were powerless and helpless. Another critical argument was that law would not encourage woman to kill their husbands inorder to escape abuse. Feminist scholars believe that woman should take rationalised actions instead.

The doctrine is a ‘defense necessity’ based on the idea that woman

Contradicting the above arguments few scholors argued that the doctrine is a ‘defense necessity’ based on the idea that woman are placed in a difficult situation, her context and location should be taken into account while adjudicating. The law further uses the principle of reasonable standards. The inclusion of psychological defense would therefore imply that the law chooses to consider psychological mindset of the person and the conditions in which a reasonable person may react in similar circumstances. Thus the pschological doctrine upholds.

R v. Ahluwalia was the first matter where the defense of battered woman syndrome was pushed and the immediacy requirement of provocation was done away with. In this case Kiranjit Ahluwalia killed her violent and abusive husband.She claimed provocation and the judge directed the jury to consider whether she did lose her self-control, a reasonable person being a well educated Asian married woman living in England would have lost her self-control given her husband’s provocation. On appeal it was argued that the judge should have directed the jury to consider a reasonable person suffering from Battered Woman Syndrome. Upon considering fresh medical evidence the court of appeal ordered a retrial as new evidence showed diminished responsibility of English law.

Partner told her he will murder her while she sleeps

Similarly in R v. Thornton, Sara Thornton was facing an abusive and violent situation where her partner told her he will murder her while she sleeps. Due to this she was psychologically paralysed that her partner may kill her anytime. Owing to the threat and fear she stabbed her partner. She was convicted of murder. The court rejected her plea that she committed the murder inorder to psychologically protect herself. Upon fresh medical evidence that she had a personality disorder the court of appeal ordered a retrial. The victim does not have to be in a position to carry out threats immediately.

Section 3 isapplicable to a battered woman who has committed murder

In India Battered Woman does not have a legal status, areper se, because there is no specific law dealing with her. None of the exceptions to murder as laid down in Section 3 isapplicable to a battered woman who has committed murder. Most of the cases  are settled in home surroundings as they rarely reach the police station and courts. Also unfortunately the Indian criminal justice system is based on victorian ideology and gender stereotypes. This scenario makes us question if we are really advancing and if our laws are protecting and safeguarding the interests of women in India?

woman to tolerate the cruelty subjected by their spouse silently

The social,cultural,religious and structural factors all train a woman to tolerate the cruelty subjected by their spouse silently. Instead of resorting to aggression women here voice their concerns within immediate martial family or involve kinship to pressurize the husbands to stop the act of violence, on the continuance of the same they eventually end up committing suicide.

In Aneesh Kumar v  State Of Bihar the Supreme court held that the fact that Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code is a cognizable and non-bailable offence has lent it a dubious place of pride amongst the provisions that are used as weapons rather than shield by disgruntled wives. The simplest way to harass is to get the husband and the relatives arrested under this provision. In quite a number of cases bed ridden grandmothers, grandfathers and relatives living abroad have been arrested. The courts did not stop here.  Rather it issued a guidelines ‘to prevent unnecessary arrest and mechanical detention’. Inspite of such baseless and irrational claims women activists have been successful in enacting Protection Of Women Against Domestic Violence Act 2005.

The manner in which domestic violence cases are dealt with is worrisome.

The law does not take into account a woman’s pain, emotional and social situation which she is subjected to. However it is noteworthy to mention that inspite of so many structural and judicial flaws  the Delhi High Court in the matter of State v Hari Prashad has held the accused guilty under section 306 of IPC for abetting suicide of the victim while acquitting him under Section 304B. In this case the accused wife, Pushpa poured kerosene oil over herself and set herself ablaze for the reason that she was harassed by the accused. The accused who was unhappy with the dowry received would mentally and physically torture his wife. Upon complaining to Crime against women cell, the accused apologised and promised to mend his ways. The night when Pushpa committed suicide she was furiously beaten by the accused. The court stated that Pushpa took all the steps to salvage her marriage and the accused failed in his duty to provide her a peaceful and happy matrimonial environment. A prudent man could reasonably foresee that Pushpa was sending out distress signals and was bound to take such extreme step which she did for no fault of hers.

Cases like the above are like tip of the iceberg for drawing attention of the administrative agencies and woman social activists that we have to still go far to protect the woman in society as woman are still not in a position to save themselves or to escape from such intolerable environment. Thus social structural changes along with eliminating traces of patriarchy may help create violent free homes.

Matrimonial Advocates

Family lawyers for Divorce cases

Last month I had to go with a friend to see a firm of family lawyers, Rajendra law office., Chennai. There are many Divorce lawyers Rajendra law office can be proud of and the firm that we went to see were one of the best. The guy which we had an appointment with was one of those people to whom you can instantly open up to and feel confident that he could help you. He was a small man with a beard and glasses. If you looked at him outside of the office, you could probably guess that he was a solicitor just by his mannerisms and attitude.

Call : +91-9994287060 for best Lawyers for Divorce cases in Chennai

Name(required)

Phone(required)

Email(required)

Comment(required)

Submit

Δ

His office is at the Decent places of Annanagar, Mogappair and KK Nagar. He should have a larger and better office to see clients in. Upon meeting him, I understood why he had come so highly recommended. His manner was open and honest and not at all the way that I had heard about lawyers being shifty. The advice that he gave was straight to the point and did not gloss over the difficulties which would have to be faced by my friend.

Good Advocates for Family Cases in Chennai

The lawyer explained all the details about the case and was tactful as well as seeming to actually care about the client’s problems. I left the office feeling that my friend was in good hands and that the case would go in her favour. It later turned out that it did and she was very happy to have won, even though it was a sad situation. When it comes to matters of custody and divorce, there are no real winners, only degrees of losing.

Solicitor for Family Court in Chennai

In order to become a solicitor, you will need to have certain qualifications. To get a law degree, it will take three years for a law graduate, 4 years for a non-law graduate and six years for a non –graduate. You may wonder about the way that you can become a Family lawyer, without being a law graduate, well the thing is that you can do a conversion course, where if you have other qualifications, then you can do this course to study law.

Law firm for Best solution for Matrimonial disputes in Chennai

Being a Matrimonial lawyer is hard work and at first the pay is not too great. You will have to sit for a number of exams and have an apprenticeship with a law firm for a couple of years. The hours are long and there is a lot of stress, but you get to have the feeling that you are helping people who have come to you for advice.

Top Divorce lawyers in Chennai

The lawyer that I met in the firm of family lawyers, Rajendra law office., Chennai had files piled high on every available service including divorce cases, even on the stairs, leading to his office. Looking at this, you may think that he is overworked and probably underpaid, but he came across as very satisfied with his job and I know that he makes a difference.

Visit : http://www.lawyerchennai.com/ for more details about advocates for Family court at Chennai